What should be the protocol to manage high grade dysplasia in IBD?

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Guideline contents > What should be the protocol to manage high grade dysplasia in IBD?
Colonoscopy surveillance banner.png

Information on authorship and revision

Last modified:
13 March 2013 06:13:35

Author(s):

Connell, W, Kamm, M, Kench, J, Leong, R, Walsh, A. What should be the protocol to manage high grade dysplasia in IBD? [Version URL: http://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=40243, cited 2013 May 19]. Available from http://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Clinical_question:What_should_be_the_protocol_to_manage_high_grade_dysplasia_in_IBD%3F. In: Cancer Council Australia Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for Surveillance Colonoscopy. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia. Available from: http://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Colorectal_cancer/Colonoscopy_surveillance.

Contents

What should be the protocol to manage high grade dysplasia in IBD?

If high grade dysplasia (HGD) is diagnosed in flat mucosa and confirmed by a separate pathologist, surgery is usually required. According to a review of 10 dysplasia studies, a finding of high grade dysplasia was accompanied by actual cancer in 42%, and in the rest who underwent surgery, definite dysplasia was usually detected in colectomy specimens.[1] Experience from the 30 year St Mark’s Hospital surveillance programme found that 19/600 (3.2%) developed HGD. Of these, 11 underwent immediate colectomy and five (45%) had cancer in the operative specimen. Eight patients refused immediate surgery, of whom two subsequently developed CRC. In total, 37% of all patients with HGD eventually developed CRC.[2]

CCA comment button.png
Submit new evidence

Back to top


Evidence summary and recommendations

Evidence summary Level References
The predictive value of HGD for imminent or established cancer is high. II [2], [1]
Recommendation Grade
High grade dysplasia in flat mucosa is a strong risk factor for established or imminent carcinoma, and colectomy is usually recommended. B
CCA comment button.png
Submit new evidence

Back to top


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Bernstein CN, Shanahan F, Weinstein WM. Are we telling patients the truth about surveillance colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis? Lancet 1994 Jan 8;343(8889):71-4 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7903776].
  2. 2.0 2.1 Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, Rumbles S, Schofield G, Kamm MA, et al. Thirty-year analysis of a colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis Gastroenterology 2006 Apr;130(4):1030-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16618396].
CCA comment button.png
Submit new evidence

Back to top


Appendices

View body of evidence View body of evidence View initial literature search View literature search documentation
Personal tools
Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Cancer Council Australia Clinical Guidelines
Guideline Development Methodology
Australian Adult Cancer Pain Management Group
Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA)
Technical issues
Toolbox
Help