Position statement - Soy, phyto-oestrogens and cancer prevention

From National Cancer Prevention Policy
Obesity > Position statement - Soy, phyto-oestrogens and cancer prevention

Home > Position statement - Soy, phyto-oestrogens and cancer prevention

Overview   Impact   Links   Policy context   Effective interventions   Policy priorities   Position statements
Position statement banner - NPA - soy, phyto-oestrogens and cancer prevention.jpg

Position statement - Soy, phyto-oestrogens and cancer prevention

Key messages

  • Phyto-oestrogens are bioactive substances found in plant foods, with naturally occurring oestrogenic activity. Soy beans and other foods containing soy, such as tofu, tempeh and soy milk, are rich sources of phyto-oestrogens.
  • There is limited suggestive evidence that soy foods may lower the risk of prostate and stomach cancer. Current evidence is too limited to permit a probable or convincing causal judgement, but does suggest there is an effect. The evidence for soy foods and cancer of the pharynx, oesophagus, pancreas, breast and endometrium is limited such that no conclusion can be made of an association. There is no association between soy foods and the risk of other cancers, including bowel cancer.
  • While soy foods may have a protective effect, there is also some evidence that phyto-oestrogens might stimulate the growth of existing hormone-dependent cancers.
  • Cancer Council supports the consumption of soy foods in the diet. This is consistent with Cancer Council recommendations and national dietary guidelines to eat a diet high in plant based foods.
  • Cancer Council does not recommend or support the use of supplements such as soy protein isolates or isoflavone capsules for healthy men and women to prevent cancer.


The purpose of this position statement is to summarise and evaluate the evidence linking soy foods and phyto-oestrogens with cancer. There is increasing interest in soy foods and phyto-oestrogens regarding their possible health benefits for a number of conditions, including cardiovascular disease, menopausal symptoms, osteoporosis and cancer. It is important that Cancer Council evaluate the associations between soy and cancer risk in order to develop its messages and recommendations, especially for women who already have breast cancer.

Back to top


Phyto-oestrogens are phytochemicals (bioactive substances that occur in plant foods) with naturally occurring oestrogenic activity. Particularly high concentrations of phyto-oestrogens are found in soy beans and other foods containing soy.

Phyto-oestrogens achieved notoriety in the 1940s in Western Australia when sheep fed large quantities of clover fodder developed a reproductive abnormality known as clover disease, which resulted in fertility problems and loss of productivity. Phyto-oestrogens in the clover were subsequently identified as the bioactive substance responsible for the reproductive abnormality[1].

The lower breast and prostate cancer mortality rates in Asian countries and the potential anti-oestrogenic effects of phyto-oestrogens have led to speculation that soy foods reduce cancer risk.

Back to top

Types of phyto-oestrogens

There are three classes of phyto-oestrogens:

  • isoflavonoids/isoflavones – found in legumes, with soy beans being the richest source;
  • lignans – a constituent of dietary fibre and found mainly in nuts, seeds, legumes, cereals, vegetables and fruits; and
  • coumestans – found in sprouted beans, alfalfa and clover.

Soy beans and soy products provide the main sources of phyto-oestrogens in the human diet. Soy phyto-oestrogens (isoflavones) comprise mainly genistein (60%) and daidzein (30%), with smaller quantities of glycitein (10%)[2]. Isoflavonoids are stable to heating and some processing techniques[2]. Genistein and daidzein have a similar structure to oestradiol, and are able to bind to oestrogen receptors, albeit with a lower affinity than oestradiol[2].

Back to top

Food sources

Foods containing soy include tofu, tempeh and soy milk, which are rich sources of phyto-oestrogens. A list of different soy foods and their relevant phyto-oestrogen content is shown in Table 1. Although fermentation of soy can reduce the amount of isoflavones present, the bioavailability of isoflavones is higher in fermented products[3]. Generally, it is thought that 30-50 mg of isoflavones is enough to offer health benefits.

Table 1. The phyto-oestrogen content of different soy foods[3][4]

Food Total isoflavone (mg/100 g)
Soy beans 2-221
Tofu 4-67
Tempeh 103
Soy milk 1-21

Dietary intake of phyto-oestrogens

In communities consuming traditional soy foods, estimates of average isoflavone intakes range between 11 and 54 mg/day[5][6]. This is equivalent to one or two serves of soy foods on a daily basis.

Tofu contributes the largest amount of soy to most Asian diets[7]. In Western diets, the majority of the isoflavone/phyto-oestrogen intake comes from non-soy foods, such as soy additives in baked goods, tuna or coffee[8]. A high dietary intake of phyto-oestrogens in most studies in Western populations corresponds to a low intake in most studies of Asian populations[9].

Back to top

Views on soy and phyto-oestrogens in cancer prevention reports

The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) found in 2007 that there was limited suggestive evidence that pulses (legumes), including soy and soy products, lowered the risk of prostate and stomach cancer. WCRF also found that the evidence for soy and soy products was limited with no conclusion possible for cancer of the pharynx, oesophagus, pancreas, breast and endometrium[10].

The World Health Organization concluded in 2003 that there was insufficient evidence that soy foods or phyto-oestrogens reduce the risk of breast cancer[11].

Back to top

Epidemiological evidence

The results from experimental studies have been conflicting, with soy foods and phyto-oestrogens showing both risk enhancing and risk reducing effects. Caution is required in interpreting the results of epidemiologic studies relating to phyto-oestrogens due to potential exposure misclassification, confounding and lack of a dose response.

Back to top

Breast cancer

The WCRF found that there was insufficient evidence available on the association between the consumption of soy products and breast cancer risk to be able to make a conclusion on any association[10].

A 2011 meta-analysis of 14 studies of breast cancer incidence found that consumption of soy isoflavones was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer incidence (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-0.99). However, this effect was only observed among studies conducted in Asian populations, not in Western populations[12].

A 2010 meta-analysis of 21 studies (11 prospective cohort studies and 10 case-control studies) found that lignan exposure was not associated with breast cancer risk (RR= 0.92; 95% CI= 0.81-1.02). However, in postmenopausal women, high lignan intake was associated with a significant reduced risk of breast cancer (RR= 0.86; 95% CI= 0.78-0.94)[13].

A 2006 meta-analysis found that soy intake is associated with a modest reduction in breast cancer risk (odds ratio (OR)=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.75-0.99)[9]. This meta-analysis included results from 12 case-control and six cohort studies. However, the heterogeneity across studies limited the ability to interpret the findings and the authors advised against making any recommendations for using soy as a cancer prevention agent.The inverse association between soy exposure and breast cancer risk was slightly stronger in premenopausal women (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58-0.85) than in post menopausal women (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.60-0.98)[9].

Another 2006 meta-analysis of 21 studies (14 case-control studies and 7 cohort studies) found that soy consumption was associate with reduced breast cancer risk (RR=0.75, 95% CI= 0.59-0.95). Isoflavone intake specifically was associated with a decrease in risk (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.99)[14].

An earlier meta-analysis found that consumption of soy foods was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer (OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.68-0.91)[15]. This study was funded by the soy food industry. This meta-analysis included results from 11 case-control and three cohort studies.

Back to top

Prostate cancer

A 2009 meta-analysis of five cohort studies and eight case-control studies found that consumption of soy foods was associated with decreased prostate cancer risk[16]. The effect was seen with total soy food intake (OR= 0.69, 95% CI= 0.57-0.84) and with non-fermented soy foods (OR= 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62-0.89)[16].

Another 2009 meta-analysis of 15 studies similarly found that total soy food consumption was associated with decreased prostate cancer risk (RR= 0.74, 95% CI= 0.63-0.89), as was consumption of non-fermented soy foods (RR= 0.70, 95% CI= 0.56-0.88)[17].

A 2005 meta-analysis showed that soy consumption was related to a lower risk of prostate cancer in men (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.59-0.83)[18]. It should be noted that this study was funded by the soy food industry. This meta-analysis included results from six case-control and two cohort studies.

Back to top

Bowel cancer

There does not appear to be an association between soy consumption and bowel cancer[19][20]. Although most case-control and cohort studies show weak inverse associations between higher soy consumption and bowel cancer, the results have not been statistically significant, with most of the confidence intervals crossing one[20].

A 2010 meta-analysis of studies investigating the link between soy food consumption and bowel cancer risk found no over all association[19]. However, when data were analysed ont he basis of gender, soy food intake was associated with a reduction in bowel cancer risk in women (RR= 0.79, 95% CI= 0.65-0.97), but not in men (RR= 1.10, 95% CI= 0.90-1.33)[19].

Back to top

Other cancers

There is no association between soy foods and the risk of other cancers. There is some limited evidence to suggest that phyto-oestrogens have enough oestrogenic activity to stimulate cell growth in the endometrium of post menopausal women, although the evidence overall is inadequate to draw conclusions on whether phyto-oestrogens taken by perimenopausal or post menopausal women eventually would cause endometrial cancer[21].

Back to top

Potential mechanisms of action

Breast cancer

As phyto-oestrogens are strikingly similar in chemical structure to oestradiol, a potential mechanism of action for phyto-oestrogens is their ability to bind to oestrogen receptors. However phyto-oestrogens also have effects that are unrelated to oestrogen activity. They act as antioxidants to inhibit free radical damage, and have anti-proliferative properties to inhibit tumour growth.

Most of these actions of phyto-oestrogens occur only at pharmacologic concentrations (30-185 μM) in experimental studies, rather than at the lower concentrations achievable from a dietary intake. However, at concentrations within the range achievable from dietary soy exposures (<4 μM in the blood), genistein (a type of phyto-oestrogen) exhibits oestrogenic properties, some of which could theoretically enhance breast cancer risk[22].

In contrast, there is some evidence that soy consumption, and specifically daidezin, the other key phyto-oestrogen in soy, enhances tamoxifen efficacy[23][24].

Back to top

Prostate cancer

The exact mechanism of action by which soy consumption is associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer remains to be elucidated. Short intervention studies show that serum sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations increase in men consuming tofu[25][26]. Intake of phyto-oestrogens may lead to a reduction in cell proliferation and angiogenesis and an increase in apoptosis[27][28][29][30].

Back to top

Timing of exposure

Early life may be a critical period for soy exposure. Animal studies have shown that pre-pubertal exposure to phyto-oestrogens reduces carcinogen-induced breast cancer in rats[31][32][33][34]. Some human epidemiologic studies have also shown that there is an inverse association between childhood soy exposure and reduced breast cancer risk[35][36]. As Asian women are likely to have been exposed to soy during early life, this may explain the stronger protective association seen in studies in Asian populations.

Back to top

Issues for women with existing breast cancer

A 2013 meta-analysis of five cohort studies found that soy food intake after a breast cancer diagnosis was associated with reduced breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio (HR)= 0.85, 95%CI= 0.77-0.93) and recurrence (HR= 0.79, 95%CI= 0.72-0.87)[37].

A 2011 meta-analysis of 14 studies of breast cancer incidence found that intake of soy isoflavones was inversely associated with risk of breast cancer recurrence (RR = 0.84, 95% CI= 0.70-0.99)[12].

A 2011 analysis of data from the Women's Healthy Eating and Living trial investigated the link between soy food consumption and breast cancer prognosis[24]. The study found that there were no adverse effects of soy food intake on breast cancer recurrence, or on total mortality[24].

Further, the study suggested that the largest benefits associated with soy consumption were seen in women using tamoxifen, suggesting that there may be a positive synergistic effect with the drug[24].

Back to top


Soy and phyto-oestrogens are seen by some as an alternative to oestrogen therapy to treat post-menopausal symptoms. However the oestrogenic effect of soy in potentially promoting tumour recurrence raises concern for its use by breast cancer survivors[38].

A systematic review found that phyto-oestrogens available as soy foods, soy extracts and red clover extracts do not significantly improve hot flushes or other menopausal symptoms[39]. Most of the trials lasted only three to four months, so the long term effects remain unclear[39].

Back to top


The evidence is suggestive that soy foods, as part of a healthy diet, may help to protect against cancer. This is consistent with Cancer Council recommendations and Australian Dietary Guidelines to eat a diet rich in plant foods.

Safe and efficacious levels of phyto-oestrogens have yet to be established for cancer prevention. As the results of some experimental studies suggest adverse effects from phyto-oestrogens, high dose phyto-oestrogen supplementation is not recommended or justified at this stage, especially for women with existing breast cancer.

Back to top

Health claims about soy

In 2004, the American Soybean Association petitioned the Food and Drug Authority in the USA for permission to use a health claim for the association between soy protein intake and lower risk of certain cancers, including breast cancer. The industry has since withdrawn their petition. The inconsistency of the evidence appears to have been the driving force in the withdrawal of this petition for a health claim.

In the USA, health claims on soy protein and lowered risk of heart disease are permissible.

Cancer Council does not support the use of health claims on food labels that suggest soy foods or phyto-oestrogens protect against the development of cancer.

Back to top

Future research

It would be useful for future studies to report associations for both soy foods and specific phyto-oestrogens. Studies vary as to whether they report on the following exposures:

  • Fermented vs. non-fermented soy;
  • Total soy vs. soy protein; and
  • Dietary soy consumption vs. urinary isoflavones.

As with many other nutritional factors, there is a need for better quality, well-reported, larger and longer duration studies. Studies need to be performed in populations with sufficient variation in intake of soy and phyto-oestrogens. A better understanding of the factors that affect the bioavailability of ingested phyto-oestrogens, such as absorption rate, incorporation rate into the bloodstream, and metabolism of the intestinal bacterial environment, are required.

The issue of when soy foods are eaten during the lifetime needs to be resolved, with early life exposure to soy foods appearing to be of most benefit.

Clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of soy foods and supplements for women with existing breast cancer are also needed.

Back to top

Position statement details

This position statement was reviewed and approved by the Public Health Committee September 2006 and updated October 2013.


This position statement was reviewed by:

  • Bruce Armstrong
  • Fran Boyle
  • Monica Robotin
  • Andrew Penman
  • Simone Lee
  • Hayley Ralph

Back to top


  1. Shutt DA, Weston RH, Hogan JP. Quantitative aspects of phytoestrogen metabolism in sheep fed on Subterranean Clover (Trifolium subterraneum cultivar clare) or Red Clover (Trifolium pratense). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1970;21: 713-722.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Eldridge AC, Kwolek WF. Soybean isoflavones: effect of environment and variety on composition. J Agric Food Chem 1983 Mar;31(2):394-6 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6682871].
  3. 3.0 3.1 Cornwell T, Cohick W, Raskin I. Dietary phytoestrogens and health. Phytochemistry 2004 Apr;65(8):995-1016 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15110680].
  4. Nakajima N, Nozaki N, Ishihara K, Ishikawa A, Tsuji H. Analysis of isoflavone content in tempeh, a fermented soybean, and preparation of a new isoflavone-enriched tempeh. J Biosci Bioeng 2005 Dec;100(6):685-7 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16473782].
  5. Ho SC, Woo JL, Leung SS, Sham AL, Lam TH, Janus ED. Intake of soy products is associated with better plasma lipid profiles in the Hong Kong Chinese population. J Nutr 2000 Oct;130(10):2590-3 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11015494].
  6. Somekawa Y, Chiguchi M, Ishibashi T, Aso T. Soy intake related to menopausal symptoms, serum lipids, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal Japanese women. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jan;97(1):109-15 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11152918].
  7. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Nomura AM, West DW, Kolonel LN, Horn-Ross PL, et al. Soy intake and risk of breast cancer in Asians and Asian Americans. Am J Clin Nutr 1998 Dec;68(6 Suppl):1437S-1443S [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9848513].
  8. Horn-Ross PL, Lee M, John EM, Koo J. Sources of phytoestrogen exposure among non-Asian women in California, USA. Cancer Causes Control 2000 Apr;11(4):299-302 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10843441].
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Trock BJ, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Clarke R. Meta-analysis of soy intake and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 Apr 5;98(7):459-71 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16595782].
  10. 10.0 10.1 World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.
  11. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003. Report No.: WHO technical report series 916. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42665/1/WHO_TRS_916.pdf.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Dong JY, Qin LQ. Soy isoflavones consumption and risk of breast cancer incidence or recurrence: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011 Jan;125(2):315-23 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21113655].
  13. Buck K, Zaineddin AK, Vrieling A, Linseisen J, Chang-Claude J. Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2010 Jul;92(1):141-53 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20463043].
  14. Qin LQ, Xu JY, Wang PY, Hoshi K. Soyfood intake in the prevention of breast cancer risk in women: a meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2006 Dec;52(6):428-36 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17330506].
  15. Yan L and Spitznagel EL. A meta-analysis of soyfoods and risk of breast cancer in women. International Journal of Cancer Prevention 2004;1(4): 281-293.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Hwang YW, Kim SY, Jee SH, Kim YN, Nam CM. Soy food consumption and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Cancer 2009;61(5):598-606 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838933].
  17. Yan L, Spitznagel EL. Soy consumption and prostate cancer risk in men: a revisit of a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2009 Apr;89(4):1155-63 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211820].
  18. Yan L, Spitznagel EL. Meta-analysis of soy food and risk of prostate cancer in men. Int J Cancer 2005 Nov 20;117(4):667-9 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15945102].
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Yan L, Spitznagel EL, Bosland MC. Soy consumption and colorectal cancer risk in humans: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010 Jan;19(1):148-58 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20056634].
  20. 20.0 20.1 Spector D, Anthony M, Alexander D, Arab L. Soy consumption and colorectal cancer. Nutr Cancer 2003;47(1):1-12 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14769532].
  21. American Heart Association Nutrition Committee, Sacks FM, Lichtenstein A, Van Horn L, Harris W, Kris-Etherton P, et al. Soy protein, isoflavones, and cardiovascular health: an American Heart Association Science Advisory for professionals from the Nutrition Committee. Circulation 2006 Feb 21;113(7):1034-44 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16418439].
  22. Messina MJ, Loprinzi CL. Soy for breast cancer survivors: a critical review of the literature. J Nutr 2001 Nov;131(11 Suppl):3095S-108S [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694655].
  23. Constantinou AI, White BE, Tonetti D, Yang Y, Liang W, Li W, et al. The soy isoflavone daidzein improves the capacity of tamoxifen to prevent mammary tumours. Eur J Cancer 2005 Mar;41(4):647-54 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15737570].
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Caan BJ, Natarajan L, Parker B, Gold EB, Thomson C, Newman V, et al. Soy food consumption and breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011 May;20(5):854-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21357380].
  25. Habito RC, Montalto J, Leslie E, Ball MJ. Effects of replacing meat with soyabean in the diet on sex hormone concentrations in healthy adult males. Br J Nutr 2000 Oct;84(4):557-63 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103227].
  26. Habito RC, Ball MJ. Postprandial changes in sex hormones after meals of different composition. Metabolism 2001 May;50(5):505-11 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11319710].
  27. Bylund A, Zhang JX, Bergh A, Damber JE, Widmark A, Johansson A, et al. Rye bran and soy protein delay growth and increase apoptosis of human LNCaP prostate adenocarcinoma in nude mice. Prostate 2000 Mar 1;42(4):304-14 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10679760].
  28. Castle EP, Thrasher JB. The role of soy phytoestrogens in prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2002 Feb;29(1):71-81, viii-ix [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12109358].
  29. Zhou JR, Gugger ET, Tanaka T, Guo Y, Blackburn GL, Clinton SK. Soybean phytochemicals inhibit the growth of transplantable human prostate carcinoma and tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Nutr 1999 Sep;129(9):1628-35 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10460196].
  30. Zhou JR, Yu L, Zhong Y, Nassr RL, Franke AA, Gaston SM, et al. Inhibition of orthotopic growth and metastasis of androgen-sensitive human prostate tumors in mice by bioactive soybean components. Prostate 2002 Oct 1;53(2):143-53 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12242729].
  31. Lamartiniere CA. Timing of exposure and mammary cancer risk. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002 Jan;7(1):67-76 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12160087].
  32. Cabanes A, Wang M, Olivo S, DeAssis S, Gustafsson JA, Khan G, et al. Prepubertal estradiol and genistein exposures up-regulate BRCA1 mRNA and reduce mammary tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis 2004 May;25(5):741-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14729590].
  33. Fritz WA, Coward L, Wang J, Lamartiniere CA. Dietary genistein: perinatal mammary cancer prevention, bioavailability and toxicity testing in the rat. Carcinogenesis 1998 Dec;19(12):2151-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9886571].
  34. Hilakivi-Clarke L, Onojafe I, Raygada M, Cho E, Skaar T, Russo I, et al. Prepubertal exposure to zearalenone or genistein reduces mammary tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 1999 Aug;80(11):1682-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10468283].
  35. Shu XO, Jin F, Dai Q, Wen W, Potter JD, Kushi LH, et al. Soyfood intake during adolescence and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001 May;10(5):483-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11352858].
  36. Wu AH, Wan P, Hankin J, Tseng CC, Yu MC, Pike MC. Adolescent and adult soy intake and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Carcinogenesis 2002 Sep;23(9):1491-6 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12189192].
  37. Chi F, Wu R, Zeng YC, Xing R, Liu Y, Xu ZG. Post-diagnosis soy food intake and breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14(4):2407-12 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725149].
  38. Balk E, Chung M, Chew P, Ip S, Raman G, Kupelnick B, et al. Effects of soy on health outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2005 Aug;(126):1-8 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16194125].
  39. 39.0 39.1 Krebs EE, Ensrud KE, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ. Phytoestrogens for treatment of menopausal symptoms: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004 Oct;104(4):824-36 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15458907].

Back to top