COSA comment:Head and neck cancer nutrition guidelines/Quality nutrition care - Nutrition intervention/Does nutrition intervention improve outcomes - Surgery/Does nutrition intervention improve outcomes? - Surgery

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki
  • Statements regarding the inclusion/exclusion of issues should be clearly supported by scientific evidence, and specifically outline the relevance of the suggested material to the guidelines.
  • If you have identified any gaps or errors in the content please suggest suitable text for inclusion.
  • Attach any supporting references or newly published evidence to be considered by the author group for inclusion to your comment.


How to post a public comment

  1. Create a user account and/or log in with your details
  2. To post a comment, click the blue 'Make a new comment' link below
  3. Fill in the empty boxes
    Warning: You need to fill out the subject line and box!
  4. Attach supporting references and any new papers to go with your comment and to be considered by the author group for inclusion by clicking on "Attach academic evidence".
  5. Press 'save page' to post your comment!


In order to leave a comment, you must be logged into a Cancer Council Australia account.
Log in to your account Create your account




Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Public comments - Does nutrition intervention improve outcomes - Surgery412:41, 6 November 2012

Public comments - Does nutrition intervention improve outcomes - Surgery

Post comments below


Rhonda Cousins09:48, 11 April 2011

There is one level I positive quality paper [3], which reports on results of a systematic review on the role of immunonutrition in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer. Ten randomised controlled trials (RCT’s) were included,...The pooled data showed a significant reduction in length of stay by 3.5 days, but no effect on complication rates. The trials were deemed to be small with incomplete reporting of outcomes, and the results should be interpreted with some degree of caution given that six of the ten studies were also undertaken by the same author group. The conclusions state that adequately powered trials are required to substantiate the benefit and determine the mechanism.

Does this review cover many if not all of the other studies you refer to? If so this should be the definitive answer to the question (at this stage of our knowledge as it is level 1 evidence) of whether immunonutritional support improves outcomes.

152.91.72.22011:35, 28 April 2011

Agree that the level I paper is the highest level of evidence in this area and should form the basis of our recommendations. This section has been reviewed and studies that were included in the level I paper were not repeated again.

Teresa Brown, on behalf of the authors

121.222.120.12808:47, 17 June 2011
 

There is one level I positive quality paper ....

Please note the following papers and their findings on immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery:

Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, Demartines N and Schafer M. 2011. Immunonutriton in gastrointestinal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 98: 37–48

Drover A, Daliwhal R, Weitzel L, Wishmeyer P, 0choa J and Heyland D. 2011. Perioperative Use of Arginine-supplemented Diets: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. J Am Coll Surg (article in press)

Janie Opperman Medical and Scientific Affairs Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, United Kingdom janie.opperman@uk.nestle.com

213.31.11.8023:04, 13 May 2011

Thank you for bringing these to our attention. The guidelines currently have the literature review complete to January 2011. The Cerantola paper was published in January, however focuses on GI cancer only, therefore this will be excluded. The Drover paper was published in March, and so will be included in future reviews as the guidelines are systematically updated.

Teresa Brown, on behalf of the authors.

121.222.120.12808:49, 17 June 2011