Clinical question comments:What is the evidence based surgical approach for lymphadenectomy in low and high risk apparent early stage endometrial cancer?/Evidence summary and recommendations
General information on how to comment
- If you have identified any gaps or errors in the content please suggest suitable text for inclusion.
- Statements regarding the inclusion/exclusion of issues should be clearly supported by scientific evidence.
How to post a public comment
- Create a user account and/or log in with your details
- To post a comment, click the blue 'Make a new comment' link below
- Fill in the empty boxes
- Warning: You need to fill out the subject line and box!
- Attach supporting references and any new papers to go with your comment and to be considered by the author group for inclusion by clicking on "Attach academic evidence".
- Press 'save page' to post your comment!
In order to leave a comment, you must be logged into a Cancer Council Australia account.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Public comments: Recommendations - What is the evidence based surgical approach for lymphadenectomy in low and high risk apparent early stage endometrial cancer? | 2 | 17:58, 5 October 2012 |
Public comments: Recommendations - What is the evidence based surgical approach for lymphadenectomy in low and high risk apparent early stage endometrial cancer?
Click “Reply” in the bottom right corner and an empty comment box will open. The exact wording of your comment will appear in the discussion thread, but cannot be edited by other users.
PLEASE ENSURE TO CLICK 'SAVE' TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT!
IF POSSIBLE, COULD YOU PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR NAME AND ORGANISATION TO ENABLE US TO CONTACT YOU IF WE NEED TO CLARIFY YOUR COMMENT
General information on how to comment
- If you have identified any gaps or errors in the content please suggest suitable text for inclusion.
- Statements regarding the inclusion/exclusion of issues should be clearly supported by scientific evidence.
?Add palpably enlarged nodes to this recommendation? MQ
Dear Prof Quin,
Thank you for providing comment on the draft guidelines.
The Working Party has recently met to consider all the public comments received and review the guidelines.
The following is their response to your comments above:
Agree - included "palpably enlarged nodes" in both recommendations 2 and 3.
Christine Vuletich
Manager, Cancer Guidelines Network Cancer Council Australia