Critical appraisal:De Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al 2011 3

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki

Critical Appraisal

Article being appraised

de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1067-74 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282537.


Applicable clinical question

Key Facts

Study Design

randomised controlled trial

Number of Patients:

534


Includes an economic evaluation

no

Evidence ratings

Level of evidence

II

Risk of bias
Low risk of bias Comments: Patients (N = 534) were randomly assigned to receive vandetanib 100 mg/d plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days (n = 256) or placebo plus pemetrexed (n = 278).


Size of effect
1 Reason for decision: This study did not meet the primary end point of statistically significant PFS prolongation with vandetanib plus pemetrexed versus placebo plus pemetrexed (HR, 0.86; 97.54% CI, 0.65 to 1.13; P = .219).
Relevance of evidence
2 Additional comments: PFS was the primary end point
Result of appraisal

Jutta's tick icon.png Included




Completed by

Mustafa Khasraw MBChB MD MRCP FRACP


Jutta's tick icon.png This appraisal has been completed.


Article
de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1067-74 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282537.
Assigned to
User:Nick.pavlakis
Topic area
Guidelines:Lung cancer
Clinical question
Form
Form:Critical appraisal


Section below only relevant for Cancer Council Project Officer

Edit appraisal assignment