Critical appraisal:De Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al 2011 3
From Cancer Guidelines Wiki
Critical Appraisal
Article being appraised
de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1067-74 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282537.
Applicable clinical question
Key Facts
Study Design
randomised controlled trial
Number of Patients:
534
Includes an economic evaluation
no
Evidence ratings
Level of evidence
II
Risk of bias
Low risk of bias | Comments: Patients (N = 534) were randomly assigned to receive vandetanib 100 mg/d plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days (n = 256) or placebo plus pemetrexed (n = 278). |
Size of effect
1 | Reason for decision: This study did not meet the primary end point of statistically significant PFS prolongation with vandetanib plus pemetrexed versus placebo plus pemetrexed (HR, 0.86; 97.54% CI, 0.65 to 1.13; P = .219). |
Relevance of evidence
2 | Additional comments: PFS was the primary end point |
Result of appraisal
Completed by
- Article
- de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1067-74 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282537.
- Assigned to
- User:Nick.pavlakis
- Topic area
- Guidelines:Lung cancer
- Clinical question
Section below only relevant for Cancer Council Project Officer