Critical appraisal:PORT Meta-analysis Trialists Group 2005 3
From Cancer Guidelines Wiki
Critical Appraisal
Article being appraised
PORT Meta-analysis Trialists Group. Postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD002142 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15846628.
Applicable clinical question
Key Facts
Study Design
systematic review — randomised trials only
Number of Patients:
2343
Includes an economic evaluation
no
Evidence ratings
Level of evidence
I
Risk of bias
Low risk of bias | Comments: Please replace this text and briefly describe the reasons for your rating |
Size of effect
4 | Reason for decision: When looking at overall effect of PORT on survival (all stages): HR 1.18(1.07-1.31, p=0.001) On subset analysis, there was no clear evidence of a detriment for stage III patients. Hazard ratio for N2 disease 0.97 but with wide confidence intervals - therefore no clear evidence of detrimental or beneficial effect |
Relevance of evidence
1 | Additional comments: Please replace this text and briefly describe the reasons for your rating |
Result of appraisal
Completed by
- Article
- PORT Meta-analysis Trialists Group. Postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD002142 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15846628.
- Assigned to
- User:Margot.lehman
- Topic area
- Guidelines:Lung cancer/Treatment/Non-small-cell stage III operable
- Clinical question
Section below only relevant for Cancer Council Project Officer