Critical appraisal:Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee J, et al 2014

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki

Critical Appraisal

Article being appraised

Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee J, et al. If You Did Not Document It, It Did Not Happen: Rates of Documentation of Discussion of Infertility Risk in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients' Medical Records. J Oncol Pract 2014 Dec 30 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25549654.


Applicable clinical question

Key Facts

Study Design

case series

Study aims:

This study sought to establish rates of documen- tation of discussion of risk of infertility, fertility preservation (FP) options, and referrals to fertility specialists in AYA patients’ med- ical records at four cancer centers.

Number of Patients:

231

Patient record eligibility criteria included new patients who: were diagnosed with breast cancer, leukemia/lymphoma, sar- coma, or testicular cancer in 2011; were between age 18 and 45 years at the time of diagnosis; did not have multiple primary cancers; and were not second-opinion patients.
Reported outcome(s):

The overall rate of documentation of discussion of FP is low, and results show disparities among specific groups. Although greater numbers of discussions may be occurring, there is a need to create interventions to improve documentation.

Results of outcome(s):

Of 231 records, 26% documented infertility risk discussion, 24% documented FP option discussion, and 13% documented referral to a fertility specialist. Records were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk and FP option discussions for female patients (P .030 and .004, respectively) and those with breast cancer (P .021 and .001, respectively). Records for Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk discussion (P .037). Records were less likely to document infertility risk discussion, FP option discussion, and fertility specialist referral for patients age 40 years (P <.001, < .001, and <.002, respectively) and those who already had children (all P < .001).

Includes an economic evaluation

no

Evidence ratings

Level of evidence

IV

Risk of bias
High risk of bias Comments:


Size of effect
5 Reason for decision:
Relevance of evidence
2 Additional comments:
Result of appraisal

Jutta's tick icon.png Included



Comments

Documentation is crucial to understanding the true number of patients who are referred for FP

Completed by

Dr Jessica Harris

Jutta's tick icon.png This appraisal has been completed.


Article
Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee J, et al. If You Did Not Document It, It Did Not Happen: Rates of Documentation of Discussion of Infertility Risk in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients' Medical Records. J Oncol Pract 2014 Dec 30 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25549654.
Assigned to
User:Antoinette.anazodo
Topic area
Guidelines:COSA:Cancer fertility preservation guidelines/Referral to fertility specialists
Clinical question
Form
Form:Critical appraisal


Section below only relevant for Cancer Council Project Officer

Edit appraisal assignment