Critical appraisal:Van Hezewijk M, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Chin A, Schneider I, Hoogeveen M, et al 2010 2

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki

Risk of bias assessment: cohort study

Subject selection
"New technology" group
Representative of eligible patients.
Comparison group
Representative of eligible patients
Comparability of groups on demographic characteristics and clinical features
Comparable
Measurement of outcomes
Outcome measures blind to technology used
No or not described
Same method of measurement used across comparison groups
Yes
Completeness of follow-up
Was follow-up complete and were all patients included in the analysis?
Yes (follow-up >95%) or survival analysis using all patients
Overall risk of bias
Low risk of bias Additional comments:


Jutta's tick icon.png This appraisal has been completed.


Article
van Hezewijk M, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Chin A, Schneider I, Hoogeveen M, et al. Efficacy of a hypofractionated schedule in electron beam radiotherapy for epithelial skin cancer: Analysis of 434 cases. Radiother Oncol 2010 May;95(2):245-9 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334941.
Assigned to
User:Albert.chetcuti
Topic area
Guidelines:Keratinocyte carcinoma
Clinical question
Form
Form:Quality appraisal cohort
Outcomes
3 years local recurrence free rate; Cosmetic outcome

Section below only relevant for Cancer Council Project Officer

Edit appraisal assignment