Melanoma

What is the role of confocal microscopy in melanoma diagnosis?

From Cancer Guidelines Wiki
Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma > What is the role of confocal microscopy in melanoma diagnosis?


Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma

Author(s):

In partnership with:

Melanoma Institute Australia

  Cite this page

Associate Professor Pascale Guitera FACD PhD, Menzies, S, Dr Alex Chamberlain, Soyer, P, Cancer Council Australia Melanoma Guidelines Working Party. Guidelines:Melanoma/Confocal microscopy . In: Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma. Sydney: Melanoma Institute Australia. [Version URL: https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?oldid=201389, cited 2023 Mar 30]. Available from: https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/Guidelines:Melanoma.


Last modified:
16 April 2019 00:07:28





Reflectance confocal microscopy

In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive technique that allows examination of the skin with cellular resolution. A systematic literature search up to 24 December 2015[1] identified a total of 21 studies involving 3108 patients with a total of 3602 lesions included in the per-lesion analysis: The pooled results for sensitivity and specificity were 93.6% (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) and 82.7% (95% CI: 0.81-0.84) respectively for the diagnosis of malignant lesions. Positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 5.84 (95% CI: 4.27-7.98) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.07-0.10) respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that RCM had a sensitivity of 92.7% (95% CI: 0.90-0.95) and a specificity of 78.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) for detecting melanoma. A systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration[2] compared the diagnostic accuracy of RCM and dermoscopy for cutaneous melanoma; reviewing 19 study cohorts (up to August 2016) with 2838 lesions (including 658 with melanoma); this provided 67 datasets for RCM and 7 for dermoscopy. The meta-analysis found RCM to be more accurate than dermoscopy in studies of participants with any lesion suspicious for melanoma and in participants with lesions that were more difficult to diagnose (equivocal lesion populations). For example, assuming a fixed sensitivity of 90% for both tests, specificities were 82% for RCM and 42% for dermoscopy for any lesion suspicious for melanoma (9 RCM datasets; 1452 lesions and 370 melanomas). The authors conclude that RCM may reduce the number of people receiving unnecessary surgery by up to three-quarters compared to dermoscopy. Selective participant recruitment, lack of blinding of the reference test to the RCM result, and differential verification were limitations. It was noted that studies may not have been representative of populations eligible for RCM, and test interpretation was often undertaken remotely from the patient and blinded to clinical information.

Lesions located on the head and neck, lesions in areas chronically damaged by sun-exposure[3][4], lesions dermoscopically demonstrating regression[5] and amelanotic tumors[6][7] represent the best indications for the use of RCM. It could be particularly useful to assess lentigo maligna margins.[4]

References

  1. ↑ Xiong YD, Ma S, Li X, Zhong X, Duan C, Chen Q. A meta-analysis of reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016 Aug;30(8):1295-302 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27230832.
  2. ↑ Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Saleh D, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Patel L, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 Dec 4;12:CD013190 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521681.
  3. ↑ Guitera P, Pellacani G, Crotty KA, Scolyer RA, Li LX, Bassoli S, et al. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face. J Invest Dermatol 2010 Aug;130(8):2080-91 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20393481.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Menge TD, Hibler BP, Cordova MA, Nehal KS, Rossi AM. Concordance of handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) with histopathology in the diagnosis of lentigo maligna (LM): A prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016 Jun;74(6):1114-20 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826051.
  5. ↑ Borsari S, Pampena R, Lallas A, Kyrgidis A, Moscarella E, Benati E, et al. Clinical Indications for Use of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Skin Cancer Diagnosis. JAMA Dermatol 2016 Aug 31 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580185.
  6. ↑ Łudzik J, Witkowski AM, Roterman-Konieczna I, Bassoli S, Farnetani F, Pellacani G. Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162495 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606812.
  7. ↑ Guitera P, Menzies SW, Argenziano G, Longo C, Losi A, Drummond M, et al. Dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy are complementary techniques for diagnosis of difficult amelanotic and light-coloured skin lesions. Br J Dermatol 2016 May 13 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27177158.

Back to top

Retrieved from "https://wiki.cancer.org.au/australiawiki/index.php?title=Guidelines:Melanoma/Confocal_microscopy&oldid=201389"